Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size
By A Mystery Man Writer
Description
Download scientific diagram | Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith size (OS) measured across transverse sections and (B) scale size (SS) measured from the focus to the anterior edge. Regression lines depict linear (dashed lines) and logarithmic fits (solid lines). For A, linear: OS = 1.89 + 0.09 · FL, r 2 = 0.94; log: OS = 3.29 · log e FL – 6.32, r 2 = 0.95. For B, linear: SS = –0.12 + 0.07 · FL, r 2 = 0.88; log: SS = 2.38 · log e FL – 6.07, r 2 = 0.89. from publication: Longitudinal Length Back-Calculations from Otoliths and Scales Differ Systematically in Haddock | Parallel macrostructure analysis of otoliths versus scales was conducted on Georges Bank Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus sampled in spring 2011 to test whether annuli widths of both structures yield comparable estimates of back-calculated length at age. While generally | Otolith, Otolithic Membrane and Fish | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.
13 60 mm hi-res stock photography and images - Page 4 - Alamy
7th International Science Symposium & Flats Expo by Bonefish
Relationship between fork length (FL) at capture and (A) otolith
Larval and juvenile Longfin Smelt diets as a function of fish size
PDF) A novel length back-calculation approach accounting for ontogenetic changes in the fish length – otolith size relationship during the early life of sprat (Sprattus sprattus)
Otolith morphometry and Fourier transform near-infrared (FT-NIR
Angling and Conservation of Living Fishy Dinosaurs – Fish, Fishing
Robert DeVries - Instructional Assistant Professor - University of
Decoupling of otolith and somatic growth during anadromous
First record of biological traits of the Australian endemic
from
per adult (price varies by group size)